Average rating: | Rated 3.5 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
Further detailing and clarifications are needed before we can proceed with the second round of reviews. More specifically I think the narrative need to be sharpened so as to make an explicit and combined synthesis of your findings from the survey, modelling and experimental work to derive your conclusions. How do the survey, modelling and experimental work complement each other? How do your findings from each align or contradict each other?
The manuscript with extensive comments was sent to the authors.