10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Book Chapter: not found

      Cutaneous Irritation

      other
      Springer Berlin Heidelberg

      Read this book at

      Buy book Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this book yet. Authors can add summaries to their books on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Regional Variation in Percutaneous Penetration of 14C Cortisol in Man**From the Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, California 94122.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Thoughts on irritant contact dermatitis

            K Malten (1981)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Racial differences in sodium lauryl sulphate induced cutaneous irritation: black and white.

              The different reactivity of black and white skin after exposure to sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) has been investigated. 9 white and 10 black male volunteers entered the study. The tests were performed on the back at 3 sites: untreated skin, skin pre-treated with occlusion and skin pre-delipidized. Irritant reactions were elicited applying 0.5% and 2.0% SLS via Finn chamber patch tests and monitored by means of laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV), transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and stratum corneum water content (WC). Higher TEWL, LDV, and WC values were recorded for 2.0% SLS when compared to 0.5% SLS and baselines. Pre-treatment with short-term occlusion generally increased values, while delipidization produced flattening of the data more detectable in whites than in blacks. Significant TEWL differences for the two concentrations were recorded in whites for the occluded site (P less than 0.02) while in blacks in the untreated (P less than 0.04) and delipidized (P less than 0.03) sites. LDV revealed significant changes in the untreated and pre-occluded white skin (P less than 0.05 and 0.01, respectively). In blacks, the values were significantly different only in the pre-occluded skin (P less than 0.01). Water content correlated with the visual score and was greatly increased in sites with strongly positive reactions (P less than 0.01). It appears that there are significant differences in the modulation of irritation, in the behavior of water barrier function and of the erythematous response between blacks and whites. Clinical correlations are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and book information

                Book Chapter
                1995
                : 28-61
                10.1007/978-3-662-03104-9_3
                b8dc87ef-14bb-4265-b114-a5055ed03ff9
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this book

                Book chapters

                Similar content814

                Cited by2