Chapter 2 explores the taboo on positive stories of the Soviet period in the light of the emotional story of rupture. Although quantitative analyses show that about half of the ethnic Estonians believe that certain things were better in the ESSR than currently, these positive stories remain publicly silenced. Especially in the cities one is afraid to be a national betrayer. The story of Tõnis in the countryside shows that being critical of the rupture narrative is his way to safeguard national solidarity, preserve the real, uncontaminated memories, and stay true to his ancestors. Ultimately, thus, Tõnis shares the same values as those who adhere to the rupture narrative. By circumventing closure, he assures citizen participation and preserves apolitical memories.