7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Book Chapter: not found
      Ethik im Gesundheitswesen 

      Organisationsethik in der stationären Langzeitpflege aus der Pflege heraus und mit der Pflege entwickeln – Professionelle Besonderheiten als Motiv und als intrinsische Motivation in den strukturierten Entwicklungs- und Implementierungsprozess einbinden

      other
      ,
      Springer Berlin Heidelberg

      Read this book at

      Buy book Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this book yet. Authors can add summaries to their books on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references101

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Knowledge translation is the use of knowledge in health care decision making.

          To provide an overview of the science and practice of knowledge translation. Narrative review outlining what knowledge translation is and a framework for its use. Knowledge translation is defined as the use of knowledge in practice and decision making by the public, patients, health care professionals, managers, and policy makers. Failures to use research evidence to inform decision making are apparent across all these key decision maker groups. There are several proposed theories and frameworks for achieving knowledge translation. A conceptual framework developed by Graham et al., termed the knowledge-to-action cycle, provides an approach that builds on the commonalities found in an assessment of planned action theories. Review of the evidence base for the science and practice of knowledge translation has identified several gaps including the need to develop valid strategies for assessing the determinants of knowledge use and for evaluating sustainability of knowledge translation interventions. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            When healthcare professionals cannot do the right thing: A systematic review of moral distress and its correlates.

            Moral distress occurs when professionals cannot carry out what they believe to be ethically appropriate actions. This review describes the publication trend on moral distress and explores its relationships with other constructs. A bibliometric analysis revealed that since 1984, 239 articles were published, with an increase after 2011. Most of them (71%) focused on nursing. Of the 239 articles, 17 empirical studies were systematically analyzed. Moral distress correlated with organizational environment (poor ethical climate and collaboration), professional attitudes (low work satisfaction and engagement), and psychological characteristics (low psychological empowerment and autonomy). Findings revealed that moral distress negatively affects clinicians' wellbeing and job retention. Further studies should investigate protective psychological factors to develop preventive interventions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Moral distress experienced by nurses: a quantitative literature review.

              Nurses are frequently confronted with ethical dilemmas in their nursing practice. As a consequence, nurses report experiencing moral distress. The aim of this review was to synthesize the available quantitative evidence in the literature on moral distress experienced by nurses. We appraised 19 articles published between January 1984 and December 2011. This review revealed that many nurses experience moral distress associated with difficult care situations and feel burnout, which can have an impact on their professional position. Further research is required to examine worksite strategies to support nurses in these situations and to develop coping strategies for dealing with moral distress.
                Bookmark

                Author and book information

                Book Chapter
                2021
                February 23 2021
                : 1-16
                10.1007/978-3-662-58685-3_92-1
                79c49394-6472-47d7-be9e-11197b29aabb
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this book

                Book chapters

                Similar content2,075

                Cited by1