Browse
Publications
Preprints
About
About UCL Open: Env.
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Indexing
APCs
How to cite
Publishing policies
Editorial policy
Peer review policy
Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
About UCL Press
Contact us
For authors
Information for authors
How it works
Benefits of publishing with us
Submit
How to submit
Preparing your manuscript
Article types
Open Data
ORCID
APCs
Contributor agreement
For reviewers
Information for reviewers
Review process
How to peer review
Peer review policy
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Search
Browse
Publications
Preprints
About
About UCL Open: Env.
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Indexing
APCs
How to cite
Publishing policies
Editorial policy
Peer review policy
Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
About UCL Press
Contact us
For authors
Information for authors
How it works
Benefits of publishing with us
Submit
How to submit
Preparing your manuscript
Article types
Open Data
ORCID
APCs
Contributor agreement
For reviewers
Information for reviewers
Review process
How to peer review
Peer review policy
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Search
25
views
0
references
Top references
cited by
0
Cite as...
0 reviews
Review
0
comments
Comment
0
recommends
+1
Recommend
0
collections
Add to
0
shares
Share
Twitter
Sina Weibo
Facebook
Email
2,984
similar
All similar
Record
: found
Abstract
: not found
Book
: not found
Essential Cases: Public Law
edited_book
Author(s):
Thomas E. Webb
Publication date
(Online):
September 2020
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Read this book at
Review
Review book
Invite someone to review
Bookmark
Cite as...
There is no author summary for this book yet. Authors can add summaries to their books on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Related collections
UUM Journal of Legal Studies
Author and book information
Book
ISBN (Print):
9780191897689
ISBN (Electronic):
9780191897689
Publication date (Print):
September 01 2020
Publication date (Online):
September 2020
SO-VID:
04cf67c8-1dc8-407b-92e8-62caedf7bd2c
History
Data availability:
Comments
Comment on this book
Sign in to comment
Book chapters
Congreve v Home Office [1976] QB 629, Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
R (on the application of Miller and Cherry) v Prime Minister and Advocate General for Scotland [2019] UKSC 41, Supreme Court
Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30, House of Lords
Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 147, House of Lords
R (on the application of Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice [2014] UKSC 38, Supreme Court
Hirst v United Kingdom [2005] ECHR 681, European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber)
M v Home Office [1994] 1 AC 377, House of Lords (also known as Re M)
Smith and Grady v United Kingdom [1999] ECHR 72, European Court of Human Rights
R (on the application of Begum (By her litigation friend, Rahman)) v Headteacher, Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15, House of Lords
Tyrer v United Kingdom (1979-80) 2 EHRR 1, European Court of Human Rights
Attorney General v Jonathan Cape Ltd [1976] QB 752, High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
British Railways Board v Pickin [1974] AC 765, House of Lords
A (and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56, House of Lords
R (on the application of HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] UKSC 3, Supreme Court (also known as R (on the application of Buckinghamshire CC))
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [1999] UKHL 33, in the House of Lords
R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal [2019] UKSC 22, Supreme Court
R (on the application of Detention Action) v First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) [2015] EWCA Civ 840, Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
R v Disciplinary Committee of the Jockey Club, ex parte Aga Khan [1993] 1 WLR 909, Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
R v Lord Chancellor, ex parte Witham [1998] QB 575, High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
R (on the application of Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, Supreme Court
Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40, House of Lords
Burmah Oil Company v Lord Advocate [1965] AC 75, House of Lords
Porter v Magill [2001] UKHL 67, House of Lords
Parochial Church Council of the Parish of Aston Cantlow, Wilmcote with Billesley v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37, House of Lords
O’Brien v Ministry of Justice (formerly Department of Constitutional Affairs) [2013] UKSC 6, Supreme Court
R (on the application of Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] UKHL 26, House of Lords
R (on the application of Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, Supreme Court
R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd (No. 2) [1991] 1 AC 603, House of Lords
Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374, House of Lords (also known as the GCHQ Case)
R v Chaytor and others [2010] UKSC 52, Supreme Court
Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 19, Supreme Court
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union [1995] 2 AC 513, House of Lords
R (on the application of Abbasi) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 1598, Court of Appeal
Republic of Ireland v United Kingdom (1979-80) 2 EHRR 25, European Court of Human Rights
Dimes v Proprietors of the Grand Junction Canal (1852) III House of Lords Cases (Clark’s) 759, 10 ER 301, House of Lords
Campbell v Mirror Group News Limited [2004] UKHL 22, House of Lords
AXA General Insurance Ltd v Lord Advocate [2011] UKSC 46, Supreme Court
Re Dr Bonham’s Case (1608) 8 Coke Reports 107a, 77 ER 638, Court of King’s Bench; Dr Bonham’s Case (1609) 8 Coke Reports 113b, 77 ER 646, Court of King’s Bench
A v BBC (Scotland) [2014] UKSC 25, Supreme Court
R (on the application of Public Law Project) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] UKSC 39, Supreme Court
Donoghue v Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Limited and another [2001] EWCA Civ 595, Court of Appeal
Thoburn v Sunderland City Council [2002] EWHC 195 (Admin), Divisional Court
R v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex parte Rose Theatre Trust Co. [1990] 1 QB 504, High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
R (on the application of UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, Supreme Court
Jackson v HM Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56, House of Lords
Attorney General for New South Wales v Trethowan [1932] AC 526, Privy Council
Handyside v United Kingdom (1979–80) 1 EHRR 737, European Court of Human Rights
Imperial Tobacco Ltd v The Lord Advocate (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 61, Supreme Court
Blackburn v Attorney General [1971] 1 WLR 1037, Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223, Court of Appeal
R (on the application of Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] UKHL 26, House of Lords
R (on the application of Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26, House of Lords
Ellen Street Estates Ltd v Minister of Health [1934] 1 KB 590, Court of Appeal
Re Amendment to the Constitution of Canada [1981] 1 SCR 753, also known as the Patriation Reference, Supreme Court of Canada
R v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex parte National Federation of the Self Employed and Small Businesses Ltd [1982] AC 617, House of Lords (also known as Fleet Street Casuals)
R (on the application of H) v London North and East Region Mental Health Review Tribunal [2001] EWCA Civ 415, Court of Appeal
R v Gough [1993] AC 646, House of Lords
R (on the application of Evans) and another v Attorney General [2015] UKSC 21, Supreme Court
R v Panel on Take-overs and Mergers, ex parte Datafin plc [1987] QB 815, Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
R v Inspectorate of Pollution, ex parte Greenpeace Ltd (No. 2) [1994] 2 CMLR 548, High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
R (on the application of Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] UKSC 63, Supreme Court
Osborn v Parole Board [2013] UKSC 61, before the UK Supreme Court
R v Secretary for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson [1998] AC 539, House of Lords
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind [1991] UKHL 4, House of Lords
R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No. 2) [2000] 1 AC 119, House of Lords
Mosely v United Kingdom [2011] ECHR 774, European Court of Human Rights
Similar content
2,984
Lotka's law: A testing procedure
Authors:
Miranda Pao
Cooperative transcriptional regulation of the essential pancreatic islet gene NeuroD1 (beta2) by Nkx2.2 and neurogenin 3.
Authors:
Christopher B. Newgard
,
Christopher V E Wright
,
Lori Sussel
…
Key issues in Japan’s public health centers to prepare for future pandemics: a text mining study using a topic model
Authors:
Kosuke Sakai
,
Yu Igarashi
,
Shuji Tounai
…
See all similar