Browse
Publications
Preprints
About
About UCL Open: Env.
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Indexing
APCs
How to cite
Publishing policies
Editorial policy
Peer review policy
Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
About UCL Press
Contact us
For authors
Information for authors
How it works
Benefits of publishing with us
Submit
How to submit
Preparing your manuscript
Article types
Open Data
ORCID
APCs
Contributor agreement
For reviewers
Information for reviewers
Review process
How to peer review
Peer review policy
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Search
Browse
Publications
Preprints
About
About UCL Open: Env.
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Indexing
APCs
How to cite
Publishing policies
Editorial policy
Peer review policy
Equality, Diversity & Inclusion
About UCL Press
Contact us
For authors
Information for authors
How it works
Benefits of publishing with us
Submit
How to submit
Preparing your manuscript
Article types
Open Data
ORCID
APCs
Contributor agreement
For reviewers
Information for reviewers
Review process
How to peer review
Peer review policy
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Search
5
views
1
references
Top references
cited by
0
Cite as...
0 reviews
Review
0
comments
Comment
0
recommends
+1
Recommend
0
collections
Add to
0
shares
Share
Twitter
Sina Weibo
Facebook
Email
837
similar
All similar
Record
: found
Abstract
: not found
Book Chapter
: not found
Bad Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Fallacies in Western Philosophy
Proof by Verbosity
edited_book
Author(s):
Phil Smolenski
Publication date
(Online):
October 05 2018
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Read this book at
Publisher
Buy book
Review
Review book
Invite someone to review
Bookmark
Cite as...
There is no author summary for this book yet. Authors can add summaries to their books on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Related collections
Network Medicine
Most cited references
1
Record
: found
Abstract
: not found
Book
: not found
What's So Good About Biodiversity?
Donald Maier
(2012)
0
comments
Cited
16
times
– based on
0
reviews
Bookmark
All references
Author and book information
Book Chapter
Publication date (Online):
October 05 2018
Pages
: 289-292
DOI:
10.1002/9781119165811.ch65
SO-VID:
88188483-e953-4c81-8cf1-5f3a668dcf6f
History
Data availability:
Comments
Comment on this book
Sign in to comment
Book chapters
pp. i
Front Matter
pp. 1
Introduction
pp. 35
Affirming a Disjunct
pp. 42
Affirming the Consequent
pp. 46
Denying the Antecedent
pp. 49
Exclusive Premises
pp. 55
Four Terms
pp. 60
Illicit Major and Minor Terms
pp. 63
Undistributed Middle
pp. 67
Ad Hominem
pp. 77
Ad Hominem
pp. 83
Ad Hominem
pp. 88
Ad Hominem
pp. 94
Adverse Consequences
pp. 98
Appeal to Emotion
pp. 102
Appeal to Emotion
pp. 106
Appeal to Ignorance
pp. 112
Appeal to the People
pp. 115
Appeal to Personal Incredulity
pp. 118
Appeal to Ridicule
pp. 121
Appeal to Tradition
pp. 125
Argument from Fallacy
pp. 128
Availability Error
pp. 133
Base Rate
pp. 137
Burden of Proof
pp. 140
Countless Counterfeits
pp. 145
Diminished Responsibility
pp. 149
Essentializing
pp. 152
Galileo Gambit
pp. 157
Gambler's Fallacy
pp. 160
Genetic Fallacy
pp. 163
Historian's Fallacy
pp. 165
Homunculus
pp. 168
Inappropriate Appeal to Authority
pp. 172
Irrelevant Conclusion
pp. 174
Kettle Logic
pp. 177
Line Drawing
pp. 181
Mistaking the Relevance of Proximate Causation
pp. 185
Moving the Goalposts
pp. 189
Mystery, Therefore Magic
pp. 193
Naturalistic Fallacy
pp. 196
Poisoning the Well
pp. 201
Proving Too Much
pp. 204
Psychologist's Fallacy
pp. 208
Red Herring
pp. 212
Reductio ad Hitlerum
pp. 215
Argument by Repetition
pp. 219
Special Pleading
pp. 223
Straw Man
pp. 227
Sunk Cost
pp. 230
Two Wrongs Make a Right
pp. 234
Weak Analogy
pp. 239
Accent
pp. 246
Amphiboly
pp. 250
Composition
pp. 252
Confusing an Explanation for an Excuse
pp. 255
Definist Fallacy
pp. 259
Division
pp. 261
Equivocation
pp. 266
Etymological Fallacy
pp. 270
Euphemism
pp. 273
Hedging
pp. 277
If by Whiskey
pp. 280
Inflation of Conflict
pp. 282
Legalistic Mistake
pp. 286
Oversimplification
pp. 289
Proof by Verbosity
pp. 293
Sorites Fallacy
pp. 297
Accident
pp. 301
All or Nothing
pp. 305
Anthropomorphic Bias
pp. 308
Begging the Question
pp. 311
Chronological Snobbery
pp. 314
Complex Question
pp. 317
Confirmation Bias
pp. 321
Conjunction
pp. 324
Constructive Nature of Perception
pp. 330
Converse Accident
pp. 332
Existential Fallacy
pp. 335
False Cause
pp. 338
False Cause
pp. 342
False Cause
pp. 346
False Dilemma
pp. 348
Free Speech
pp. 351
Guilt by Association
pp. 354
Hasty Generalization
pp. 357
Intentional Fallacy
pp. 360
Is/Ought Fallacy
pp. 364
Masked Man
pp. 367
Middle Ground
pp. 369
Mind Projection
pp. 371
Moralistic Fallacy
pp. 374
No True Scotsman
pp. 378
Reification
pp. 382
Representative Heuristic
pp. 385
Slippery Slope
pp. 388
Stolen Concept
pp. 392
Subjective Validation
pp. 396
Subjectivist Fallacy
pp. 399
Suppressed Evidence
pp. 403
Unfalsifiability
pp. 407
Unwarranted Assumption
pp. 410
Index
Similar content
837
Axging, Inhibition, and Verbosity
Authors:
TY Arbuckle
,
DP Gold
Verbosity Bias in Preference Labeling by Large Language Models
Authors:
Keita Saito
,
Akifumi Wachi
,
Koki Wataoka
…
Mindfulness and depression of college students: the chain mediation of experience avoidance and verbose thinking
Authors:
H Liu
,
X Wu
,
Y DENG
See all similar