1,154
views
1
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Special series and calls for papers

      See all the current UCL Open: Environment calls for papers at https://ucl-about.scienceopen.com/calls-for-papers

       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Publicly available data sources to compile an urban natural capital account according to the SEEA EEA: A London case study

      Preprint
      Withdrawn from submission
      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Government organisations and other public sector bodies are compiling standardised environmental accounts to encourage more sustainable land use choices and improve management of the natural environment and associated benefits. While the United Nations System of Environmental-Economic Accounting Experimental Ecosystem accounting (SEEA EEA) provides such as framework, practical challenges remain in particular decision-making contexts. In urban areas, natural ecosystems have unique challenges because of anthropogenic pressures, providing a mix of ecosystem services (ES) that may be valued differently compared to non-urban natural ecosystems due to peoples proximity to these. It is unknown whether existing publicly available data sources for urban areas are compatible with the SEEA EEA framework and if these sources are sufficient for the development of an inclusive natural capital accounts. Here, we explore whether an inclusive urban natural capital account that includes a broad range of ES can be compiled from publicly available data sources for Greater London between 2007 and 2018. We showed that it was not possible to compile an inclusive urban natural capital account for London per year consistent with the SEEA EEA framework because of issues with (1) temporal inconsistencies, (2) land cover classifications and (3) lack of public access to certain data sources. Greater collaboration between institutions and other organisations could support our understanding of linkages between ecosystem extent, condition and ES flows. Overall, our findings suggest the need for renewed efforts to develop a cohesive source of publicly available data, which could be supported by making interdisciplinary work standard practise.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            UCL Open: Environment Preprint
            UCL Press
            28 August 2020
            Affiliations
            [1 ] University College London
            [2 ] University of New South Wales
            Article
            10.14324/111.444/000055.v1
            6e2754fb-54a0-4ea5-9f2d-26b26ce19eb2

            This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

            Funding
            London Natural Environment Research Council Doctoral Training Programme NE/ L002485/1

            All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).
            Environmental economics & Politics,Ecology,Environmental studies,Environmental management, Policy & Planning
            SEEA EEA,SEEA,urban,Sustainability,United Kingdom,London,Public policymaking,natural capital,ecosystem accounting,Built environment,Environmental policy and practice,Environmental economics,ecosystem services,environmental accounting

            Comments

            Date: 09 September 2022

            Handling Editor: Prof Dan Osborn

            Decision and status: The submission has been declined for publication by the Editors of UCL Open: Environment and withdrawn from submission. This preprint (and all other versions of it) will remain online on the preprint server with its registered DOI, but the article is no longer under consideration for peer review at UCL Open: Environment and the authors are free to submit this manuscript to any other relevant journal of their choice. For more information about this please read the journal’s Editorial Policy online at https://ucl-about.scienceopen.com/publishing-policies.

            2022-09-09 15:06 UTC
            +1

            Date: 01/9/2020

            Handling Editor: Dan Osborn

            This article is a preprint article and has not been peer-reviewed. It is under consideration following submission to UCL Open: Environment Preprint for open peer review.

            2020-09-17 13:31 UTC
            +1
            2 people recommend this

            Comment on this article