49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Life in the pandemic: Some reflections on nursing in the context of COVID‐19

      editorial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In the unparalleled and extraordinary public health emergency in which we find ourselves, across the world nurses stand as we always do—at the front line. Nurses everywhere are staffing our clinics, hospital wards and units—in some situations, literally working until they drop, and in some regions, they are doing so while dealing with a lack of essential items. Indeed, we see reports that nurses in many parts of the world are grappling with shortages of much‐needed supplies including personal protective equipments such as masks, gloves and gowns, yet are actively embracing the challenges presented by COVID‐19. As we contemplate the ramifications of this rapidly moving global pandemic, it is clear that the need for nurses has never been greater. In responding to this dire and unprecedented health crisis, as nurses, we are doing what we have been educated and prepared to do. As nurses, we have the knowledge and skills to deliver the care needed in all phases of the illness trajectory, and in reassuring, informing and supporting people within communities who are frightened, worried and wanting to stay well. As we have seen throughout history, nurses are well able to think outside the box, and develop creative and innovative solutions to all manner of problems, conundrums and challenges. However, there remains much about this current situation that is new and frightening. For one is the speed of the spread of COVID‐19. In the fight against COVID‐19, we are working against the clock. The trajectory of this situation is such that in some areas, infection rates are doubling every 24 hr or so, and this is leading to increasing community anxiety manifesting in various ways including panic buying and hoarding of essential supplies. It is clear that this health crisis will not affect everyone in the same way. The very strong public health message is to stay home, and stay safe within that home, in the assumption that everyone has a home that is safe, and within which they have some autonomy. There is some speculation as to whether rates of domestic violence might increase at this time as a result of the extraordinary strain that families face. Poverty is also an issue. It is well known and accepted that those who are homeless and impoverished have many less options when faced with health problems, and the challenges faced by these people will be much greater in this time of pandemic (Tsai & Wilson, 2020). Similarly, people who are captive or imprisoned for any reason, such as in corrections or refugee environments and other similar settings, are particularly vulnerable (Iacobucci, 2020). Older adults are high users of services across primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare settings. Many in this group live with multiple health and social issues that increase their vulnerability, now further exacerbated by the need for social distancing. Older people are known to be at greater risk of calamitous outcomes associated with COVID‐19, and this dire picture is likely to be exacerbated because of the potential for rationing of care based on age, simply because there are not enough ventilators and other life‐saving equipments to meet demand. The risk to older people is greater than to others, and in many countries, limitations on older people activities are in place in attempts to reduce risk of exposure. In several countries, restrictions on visiting nursing homes are in place and people over 70 years of age asked to reduce outings and remain indoors as much as possible to decrease contact with others and reduce the risk of contracting the virus. While necessary, this could put older people at risk of loneliness, isolation and exacerbation of existing problems, and so it is very important that we all look out for older people in our neighbourhoods and provide support, assistance and safe social interaction as required. Nurses are at the forefront in institutional settings such as nursing homes and prisons, with homeless people, and other hard to reach populations and are grappling with the effects of low health literacy, rapidity of change and health information, and a lack of resources to ensure that all know and understand what is required to keep them safe. It is so important that we all support these vulnerable populations and the nurses working within them by advocating for resources including adequate safe accommodation for all. We know from our colleagues that despite being actively engaged in this fight against COVID‐19, in a way that few other professions are, and despite appearing calm and professional; like everyone else, many nurses are also experiencing fear of the unknown and concern for what lies ahead, for themselves, their patients, colleagues and their own families and friends. In addition to being nurses, we are also parents, siblings, friends and partners with all of the worries and concerns shared by most people—providing for and protecting ourselves and our families, and so in addition to caring for patients, the well‐being of our own families weighs heavily on us as nurses at this time. The global nature of this crisis means that while all countries are engaged in the battle against COVID‐19, some have been in the fight for longer and so there is the opportunity to learn from other countries. Indeed, in watching the unfolding horror particularly in Italy, we see just what can (and will) happen in the event that measures such as social distancing, hand hygiene and quarantine are not fully embraced by all in our communities. Earlier this year, Hong Kong was one of the first places in the world affected by the COVID‐19 virus, evoking unwanted memories of the SARS outbreak of 2003 (Smith, Ng, & Ho Cheung Li, 2020). Despite initial fears, the spread of the virus appeared to have been effectively controlled over the last two months through the use of stringent measures, including practice of good personal hygiene, avoidance of group gatherings and implementation of social isolation measures. Indeed, by the beginning of March 2020 some public services in Hong Kong had started to resume normal activity and many people were returning to the workplace. In some part, these successes were due to the excellence of the clinical nursing workforce. We saw some stability in other countries in the same region including Singapore and Taiwan. There was hope that the corner had been turned in the fight against COVID‐19; however, this has turned out not to be the case. Very recently, Hong Kong and several other South‐East Asian countries have started to face the second wave of imported coronavirus infections, with the total number of cases in Hong Kong doubling during this period. The vast majority of these new cases have involved people flying to South‐East Asia from abroad, especially students returning from North America and Europe, where COVID‐19 infection has been escalating. Singapore and Taiwan, which had each taken comfort from seeing new infections taper off in recent weeks, have also seen surges of COVID‐19 cases amongst arrivals in recent days. Health officials from these densely populated countries are now struggling to contain the new cases to avoid any new community outbreaks. A similar picture emerged in mainland China. After some sustained and marked reductions in the spread of the virus, China's National Health Commission have recently announced that all new reported cases were imported from overseas. Despite many people fully recovering from COVID‐19 infection in China, there has been some concern that a new subset of patients affected by the virus may be emerging. There are reports that a handful of the many thousands of people declared cured after treatment have been readmitted to hospitals because their symptoms have returned. At the time of writing, this worrying feature of COVID‐19 infection is only beginning to receive attention by the medical community, but clearly requires close consideration in the ongoing global fight against COVID‐19. Across the world, there are concerns that nursing's capacity to provide care will be stretched by the increased workload and by the number of front‐line nurses that are expected to be affected by COVID‐19. In Australia, authorities are considering various mechanisms such as fast‐tracking return to registration of qualified nurses who may be recently retired and allowing limited registration to people who may be suitable such as internationally qualified nurses. In the United Kingdom, there has also been a call for recently retired nurses to return to practice. Other planned strategies include establishing a COVID‐19 temporary register for nurses who have left the register within the past three years, who will be able to opt into this register. Registered nurses not currently working clinically will be encouraged to consider working within clinical practice, and undergraduate nursing students will be able to opt to undertake the final six months of their programme as a clinical placement. Part of the COVID‐19 temporary register is to include a specific student element for those in the final six months of their preregistration programme and will include details of specific conditions to ensure appropriate safeguards are in place. The fine details are still in development, and there may need to be further measures in what is a continually changing situation. In considering introducing new cadres of nurses, there are also issues around risk, retraining, refreshing and renewing knowledge. While there are some aspects of nursing that may not have changed too much over the years, health is generally a rapidly evolving field and particularly in the current situation. In contemplating returning to direct care giving roles, many retired nurses or others contemplating re‐entry may have legitimate concerns about the real contribution that they could make in the current crises, particularly when considering direct care delivery and technological advancements in practice. It will be necessary to consider carefully any possible risk for nurses returning from retirement, and the potential ways these nurses could meaningfully contribute. This may be in working in quieter areas to free up current staff, and working in roles supporting front‐line nurses. Either way, it will be crucial to have adequate learning and resourcing available to support these new cadres of nurses. However, as we identify innovative ways to provide a nursing workforce during this time of urgency, it is important that whatever we implement is safe and appropriate for staff and for patients. Patient safety is paramount and integral to nursing practice. Nurses generally become nurses because of the desire to help people regain and maintain optimal health, and here, we have a situation where there may be very few options to help those who are seriously ill because of COVID‐19. This inability to save lives will take its toll on those at the front line, both physically and emotionally. As nurses, we know death. We have seen loss of life, and we have borne witness to the pain and the suffering of the dying and the grief of those left behind. For nurses, particularly in environments where the focus is on life preserving, such as emergency departments and intensive care units, death can represent failure, and so is therefore a source of stress and distress for the medical and nursing teams in these settings. We are now in a situation where nurses everywhere are bracing for what really is a tsunami of death. Our colleagues in China and Italy have and are leading the way, and we have seen reports and first‐hand accounts of the distress and exhaustion of our Chinese and Italian colleagues who have been (and are) faced with large‐scale death on a daily basis. All aspects of nursing activity are affected by this pandemic, and healthcare facilities have responded to nursing education student clinical needs in a variety of ways. Some have restricted student presence in their organisations, while others welcome healthy students. Academic nurses have also been quick to modify in the light of the crisis caused by COVID‐19 and many have very quickly moved to online course delivery, including strategising to ensure reasonable student engagement, and making appropriate changes to examination procedures. There is also the need to recognise that many nurses currently enrolled in post‐graduate courses may now have their current studies jeopardised because of cancellation of study leave or other pre‐existing work patterns that can now no longer be guaranteed. Nurse educators and administrators are tasked with ensuring that students meet academic requirements while recognising the current pressures faced by health services and the need for nurses to be able to simultaneously meet the demands on them as nurses, students, parents, siblings, partners and the myriad of other roles that each nurse has to manage in their daily lives. The way this crisis has unfolded has meant that we have all sorts of new challenges in seeking to meet the health needs of our populations. For example, we have situations of cruise ships left sailing from port‐to‐port unable to dock; others inadvertently offloading passengers who are ill and contagious into communities, with health services left to set about tracing crew, passengers and those with whom they have been into contact. We have to prepare for the potential ramifications if COVID‐19 takes hold in very vulnerable populations, such as prisons where it will be very hard to contain because of the proximity of people. There is also the aftermath to consider. Of critical importance will be nurses’ responses to the increased anxiety and mental health needs of the population as well as within the nursing community. These are very difficult times, and the scale of the challenges is unprecedented. Every single one of us has a role to play in supporting and advocating for the health of our communities, and in supporting nurses everywhere. Nurses are the backbone of health systems around the world, and this has never been more apparent than now. Amidst all the uncertainty about the virus and how long it might take before life begins to return to normal, there can be no doubt that nursing and the provision of health care will come out the other side of this pandemic stronger and better prepared to face future challenges. We write these “reflections” in the moment, as the impacts of the pandemic unfold around us daily. We are all living it right now. When it is over, we look back and reflect upon it and with the benefit of hindsight, might make normative judgements regarding what we ought to have done and what might have been best at a certain time. Right now, we all need to be kind to each other (and ourselves) as we grapple with new ways of living and working. We want to thank nurses everywhere for their tireless efforts in this unparalleled health emergency.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          COVID-19: a potential public health problem for homeless populations

          Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is infecting people throughout the world. It is probable that coronavirus disease (COVID-19) will be transmitted to people experiencing homelessness, which will become a major problem in particular in North America where there are sizable populations of people experiencing homelessness in nearly every metropolitan city in the USA and Canada. In the USA, more than 500 000 people were reported to be experiencing homelessness on any given night over the past decade (2007–19). 1 The State of Homelessness in Canada 2016 report 2 estimated 35 000 people are experiencing homelessness on any given night in Canada. People experiencing homelessness live in environments that are conducive to a disease epidemic. Many people experiencing homelessness live in congregate living settings—be it formal (ie, shelters or halfway houses) or informal (ie, encampments or abandoned buildings)—and might not have regular access to basic hygiene supplies or showering facilities, all of which could facilitate virus transmission. People experiencing homelessness are a vulnerable group, and their potential exposure to COVID-19 might negatively affect their ability to be housed, and their mental and physical health. People experiencing homelessness aged younger than 65 years have all-cause mortality that is 5–10 times higher than that of the general population. 3 COVID-19 infection might further increase this mortality disparity. Many people experiencing homelessness have chronic mental and physical conditions, 4 engage in high rates of substance abuse (including sharing of needles), 5 and have often less access to health care, 6 all of which could lead to potential problems with screening, quarantining, and treating people who might have COVID-19. Such problems have occurred as recently as last year, when outbreaks of typhus, hepatitis A, tuberculosis, trench fever, and Shigella bacteria were reported among people experiencing homelessness in US cities with large homeless populations. 7 There are some additional issues, which are unique to people experiencing homelessness, to consider with regards to COVID-19. Homeless populations might be more transient and geographically mobile than individuals in the general population, 8 making it difficult to track and prevent transmission and to treat those who need care. COVID-19 was recently found to be transmittable via the oral–faecal route. 9 Some major US cities with large homeless populations, like San Francisco, have experienced issues with public defecation, which might pose an additional transmission risk for people experiencing homelessness and other individuals. Together, the multitude of potential vulnerabilities and risks for people experiencing homelessness in becoming infected, needing care, and transmitting COVID-19 cannot be ignored and must be planned for. Some lessons can be learned from the response to severe acute respiratory syndrome among homeless service providers nearly two decades ago. 10 Testing kits and training on how to recognise COVID-19 should be widely disseminated to homeless service providers and deployed in shelters, encampments, and street outreach. Alternative spaces might be needed to quarantine and treat people experiencing homelessness. If cities impose a lockdown to prevent COVID-19 transmission, there are few emergency preparedness plans to transport and provide shelter for the large number of people experiencing homelessness. In lockdowns, public spaces are closed, movement outside homes are restricted, and major roads of transport might be closed, all of which might negatively affect people experiencing homelessness. It is unclear how and where unsheltered people experiencing homelessness will be moved to if quarantines and lockdowns are implemented. In such a scenario, closures of shelters and other high-density communal settings (eg, drop-in centres and soup kitchens) are possible, which could increase the number of unsheltered people experiencing homelessness and reduce their access to needed services. Lockdowns and disease containment procedures might also be deleterious to the mental health of people experiencing homelessness, many of whom have fears around involuntary hospitalisation and incarceration. 11 In response to COVID-19, the State of Washington has declared a state of emergency, allowing cities to take extraordinary measures, which has included King County moving people infected with COVID-19 to housing units that were originally intended to provide housing for people experiencing homelessness. 12 As other cities follow suit, these actions might further displace people experiencing homelessness and put them at greater risk of COVID-19. Another complicating matter is that in December, 2019, the US Supreme Court declined to review the case of Martin v City of Boise, upholding a ruling that cities cannot arrest or punish people for sleeping on public property unless cities have provided adequate and accessible indoor accommodations. This legal precedent prevents the criminalisation of homelessness, but it is unclear if and how it will be applied during COVID-19 outbreaks. Cities with large homeless populations might face unique challenges while trying to contain COVID-19 and addressing homelessness, with the potential for both issues to exacerbate one another.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            COVID‐19: Emerging compassion, courage and resilience in the face of misinformation and adversity

            In her excellent editorial, “Rising from the ashes: affirming the spirit of courage, community resilience, compassion and caring,” Professor Alison Kitson raised several pertinent issues around caring in and for the world that we live in, set against the devastation caused by the Australian bushfires (Kitson, 2020). Whilst watching the horrendous television footage of the Australian disaster unfolding at the beginning of the year, another news item was beginning to gain momentum, the emergence of an unknown coronavirus disease in Mainland China. Once more, we witnessed dreadful humanitarian images that looked like footage from a science fiction movie, sick people being heralded into makeshift camps by individuals in protective suits. However, once again it was not a movie, it was very real. Living in Hong Kong, the emergence COVID‐19 immediately drew parallels with the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak, which brought devastation to the region. The profound impact that SARS had upon the people of Hong Kong can still be clearly seen seventeen years later; people habitually wearing protective facemasks, communally touched surfaces in public places being regularly disinfected, antibacterial hand gel dispensers located throughout all shopping centres, and public toilets that are amongst the cleanest in the world. The intent to prevent another SARS‐like infection in Hong Kong is clear for all to see; however, that all changed at the end of last year with the emergence of novel coronavirus in Mainland China, Quickly, cases were confirmed in Hong Kong and the fear of another pandemic lead rapidly to a pandemic of fear. People were panic buying, prices were rising, and supermarket shelves were very quickly stripped of essential food items and basic cleansing products. It was impossible to turn on the television without being told about the importance wearing surgical masks, how to wear surgical masks, the surgical masks celebrities were wearing and the danger of wearing “fake” surgical masks. Interestingly, limited attention was being given to the effectiveness of wearing a surgical facemask in the face of viral infection. Surgical masks were, and still are, in very short supply and retail prices have increased sharply. One enduring television image of recent weeks has been the sight of older people standing in line overnight in cold weather to get a small package of surgical masks hoping to protect themselves from the virus. Perhaps, all of these activities mask the truly important public health message that good personal hygiene and effective handwashing is the most effective way to curb the spread of the virus. As clinical nurses, we all know that engaging in these actions will outweigh the benefits of wearing any surgical mask. SARS generated a lot of very influential nursing research, particularly in the field of infection control nursing. The Journal of Clinical Nursing published several significant papers that highlighted the emotional impact of caring at the time of SARS and dealt with some of the other lessons that could be learnt from the outbreak, in terms of evaluating systems of care delivery and use of nursing care models (Watson, 2009). It was hoped that research generated during this period would help the international nursing community be in a better position to deal more effectively with any subsequent viral outbreaks. With the emergence of COVID‐19, that was about to be tested. Would healthcare managers and hospital administrators understand what is really needed to support nursing practice and ensure the provision of high quality of care? Would they deliver this time? It was clear that amidst a worsening humanitarian crisis in Wuhan and the surrounding regions of China that uncertainty was rife. Despite widespread efforts in the Chinese mainland to combat the control and spread of COVID‐19, including the very quick construction of purpose‐built hospitals; at the time of writing, many large cities remain in complete “lock down,” with an ongoing massive quarantine of over 50 million people. COVID‐19 was about to show no respect for geographical borders and to test whether the world was ready to deal effectively with a health risk of such high magnitude. Reflecting on this situation at the beginning of the year, it was possible to see that there were parallels in relation to issues of caring, compassion, courage and resilience between the struggle with the COVID‐19 and those of the Australian disaster, as outlined by Alison Kitson (2020). This editorial sets out to examine some of these issues that are closely associated with the nursing profession. Historically, nurses have always played an important role in infection prevention, infection control, isolation, containment and public health, as initially advocated by Florence Nightingale. Providing these aspects of care at this capricious time, our clinical nursing colleagues in China and around the world are working under enormous pressure to battle this life‐threatening viral infection. Worryingly, it is clear that many of these nurses and healthcare professionals are not only fighting the virus, they are also fighting the humanitarian crisis with limited protective supplies, putting their own lives on the line. Howard Catton (ICN CEO) commended the courage and compassion that has been shown by Chinese nurses, stressing the importance of them having access to the correct safety equipment and clothing at this time. However, there have been numerous reports of shortages of even the basic personal protective equipment, such as masks and protective suits (ICN, 2020). It has even been reported that in some rural Chinese hospitals, clinical staff have resorted to wearing their raincoats and using plastic bags as a source of protection (Buckley, Wee, & Qin, 2020). World Health Organization Director‐General Mr Tedros hailed healthcare workers as “the glue that holds the health system and the outbreak response together” (WHO, 2020). Indeed, the WHO provides very comprehensive guidelines for the protection of front‐line healthcare workers when faced with such an epidemic. The question is how can nurses adhere to such guidance when they are starved of even the most basic personal protective equipment? How adhesive can “the glue” be in the face of such adversity? One third of all fatalities during the 2003 SARS outbreak in China were healthcare professionals (Hung, 2003); at the time of writing, COVID‐19 has already accounted for the lives of eight healthcare professionals (Griffiths, 2020). Healthcare‐associated amplification of transmission of emerging viral infections is always a concern; surely, lessons should have been learnt about the importance of occupational protection during previous epidemics, including the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outbreak in 2012. Clearly, some lessons have not been learnt, as clinical nurses in China who are battling the virus are working around the clock and some are not eating food so as to avoid the need for toilet breaks (Thiagarajan, 2020). Nursing staff need to change their protective gear if they take a toilet break; therefore, some have resorted to wearing diapers and there are even stories of nurses shaving their heads to reduce spread of infection and to allow them to be able to change their protective gear more quickly (Farber, 2020). Stories of nursing courage and compassion are bounteous; however, the narrative of Nurse Yao, captured by the BBC, is one which is particularly touching. Her day‐to‐day job was in a fever clinic, she decided not to celebrate Chinese Lunar New Year with her family and chose to volunteer to work in a hospital in the epicentre of the virus. In a moving narrative, she expressed her strong devotion to care for those with the virus, reporting long working shifts “at the end of the shift, when we take off our suits, we find our clothes are completely wet with sweat” and exhaustion “nursing staff would collapse at the end of their shift and they were too tired to walk home.” Despite working in such adversity, Nurse Yao chose to highlight the positive aspects of her work with her nursing colleagues “the virus brings us all together, it unites us.” (BBC, 2020a). The word resilience is used a lot these days, and it has become something of a buzzword in nursing, leading to criticism from within and out with our profession. However, if we view resilience as “the ability of an individual to withstand adversity” (Jackson, Firtko, & Edenborough, 2007 p3), then Nurse Yao embodies what it is to have resilience in nursing. During the last few weeks, there have been unprecedented levels of misinformation, conspiracy theories, fake news and rumours related to COVID‐19, these can only be counterproductive in the fight against the current epidemic. Perhaps, this is the first major disease outbreak that poses a global threat in the age of social media. Accounts vary, but it is clear that social media and sensationalist reporting of the outbreak have generated panic and mistrust in the general public, not only diverting attention away from the response to outbreak but also impeding the activities of already stretched healthcare professionals. Hopefully, we and the general public can gain some reassurance because the WHO are using their Information Network for Epidemics platform to track for false information in numerous languages and are working with social media providers, including Facebook, Twitter and Weibo (a Chinese blog platform) to help filter out such misinformation. Conceivably, COVID‐19 will provide an opportunity to put into practice some of the lessons we learn from studies of social media during this outbreak, specifically in relation to the dynamics of online heroisation and blame. However, it does remain difficult to know what to believe with the current media coverage of COVID‐19. Remarkably, the WHO have deemed it necessary to circulate a statement indicating several measures, that have been touted online and in social media, which are not effective in the treatment of COVID‐19 including taking excessive vitamin C, smoking (yes seriously!), wearing multiple surgical masks and self‐medicating with antibiotics. The WHO also provides “Open WHO,” which offers free and reliable health‐related information to the world. In China, medical advertisers have not missed the opportunity to capitalise on the outbreak of COVID‐19, reporting that one traditional Chinese herbal remedy may be effective in the prevention and treatment of the COVID‐19 (Heymann & Shindo, 2020). This remedy has now sold out across China, despite the fact that there is presently very limited evidence to support the claims; indeed due to the nature of the illness, it may actually produce counterproductive effects. It is also somewhat ironic that the most likely crossover of the virus took place at a wet market, selling the very foods and remedies that are used in traditional health practices to promote immunity and longevity. The scientific community certainly needs more high‐quality rigorous research into the issues surrounding the combined use of Western and Chinese medicine in the prevention and treatment of disease. As well as stories of courage and strength, times of crisis have been known to bring out the darker side of human nature. Historically, the response to new diseases and other catastrophic events have been known to evoke feelings of mistrust, hatred, fear and outright racism. It has been shocking to hear the nature and the extent of anti‐Chinese racism and stereotyping that has been reported around the world (BBC, 2020c). From “coronavirus student parties” to the outright ban of people of Chinese ethnicity from many restaurants, it would appear once again that the fear of pandemic has further stoked a pandemic of fear. Healthcare professionals have not been exempt from such expression of hatred and racism, the BBC reported one Filipino cardiac nurse in England being asked to “stop spreading the virus” whilst on public transportation (BBC, 2020b). Such levels of xenophobia and racial profiling are utterly abhorrent and have no place in a modern civilised society. Unfortunately, racism in the face of humanitarian disasters has a much longer history than that of the current COVID‐19 outbreak. Human catastrophes are not just the result of natural phenomenon; they are linked to political, social and economic factors that create vulnerability to risk. Any response to a major disease outbreak is always deeply political. Racist fear mongering and pointing the finger of blame towards Chinese and Asian nationals may have contributed to the development of the current disaster. Several nurses and doctors have lost their lives to COVID‐19, including Dr Li Wenliang who was one of the first medical doctors to express concern about the emergence of a new SARS‐like illness in the Hubei province (Green, 2020). Another important lesson that should have been learnt from previous experience, such as the SARS outbreak, is the need for appropriate psychological support for the healthcare professionals. Clinical nurses, especially those working in hospitals providing front‐line care for those with COVID‐19, are not only vulnerable to a higher risk of infection but also mental health problems. The Journal of Clinical Nursing reported increased levels of post‐traumatic stress disorders, anxiety and depression in nurses after the SARS outbreak (Thompson, Lopez, Lee, & Twinn, 2004). They may experience fears of contagion and spreading the virus to others, including loved ones. We cannot ignore the need for timely psychological support and care specialised for those affected, psychiatric treatments and appropriate mental health services need to be provided. COVID‐19 presents a vast public health challenge, not only to China, but also around the world. As outlined in this editorial, it has already posed many challenges to our profession and international research community. It was only through high‐quality nursing research that some of the questions raised by the SARS outbreak were answered and lessons were learned. In some ways, COVID‐19 may act as a wake‐up call to the world to revisit those lessons and to re‐examine public health priorities. We live in a very different world from that of 2003, it is a constantly changing and very unpredictable world. Hopefully, this outbreak will provide scope and impetus for nurse researchers to address some of the key questions that have been thrown up by the current epidemic and we need to do this in a collaborative way and from an international perspective. We, as nurse researchers, should be mindful of the benefits of conducting this research with healthcare colleagues in related professions to further develop the knowledge base of the international scientific community. Despite extensive efforts, there also needs to be more international collaboration amongst government, health agencies and key stakeholders to ensure the response to the outbreak is optimised and to ensure timely dissemination of accurate information. There should not be a disconnection between those communicating the information and those requiring it, importantly the internet and social media should not become the clearing house for vital health‐related information for the general public. Presently, outbreaks of COVID‐19 have been declared in at least thirty countries, most markedly in Italy, Iran and South Korea (BBC, 2020d). The latter, which was badly affected by MERS outbreak in 2012, is now on its highest alert. The WHO has warned the world to brace itself in preparation for a pandemic (BBC, 2020e). As nurses, we possess invaluable information on how to deal effectively with public health issues, as Professor Kitson urged we should not be afraid to speak out on those issues. At this time of great uncertainty, the voice of the nursing profession needs to be heard by the world. Not only in the battle against COVID‐19, but also in preparation for the next major health challenge. Globally, public health depends upon it.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Covid-19: Doctors warn of humanitarian catastrophe at Europe’s largest refugee camp

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor in Chief, Journal of Clinical Nursingdebra.jackson@uts.edu.au
                Role: Editor, Journal of Clinical Nursing
                Role: Editor, Journal of Clinical Nursing
                Role: Editor, Journal of Clinical Nursing
                Role: Editor, Journal of Clinical Nursing
                Role: Editor, Journal of Clinical Nursing
                Role: Editor, Journal of Clinical Nursing
                Journal
                J Clin Nurs
                J Clin Nurs
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702
                JOCN
                Journal of Clinical Nursing
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0962-1067
                1365-2702
                12 April 2020
                : 10.1111/jocn.15257
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] University of Technology Sydney Sydney NSW Australia
                [ 2 ] University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
                [ 3 ] Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD USA
                [ 4 ] Bournemouth University Bournemouth UK
                [ 5 ] University of Wisconsin ‐ Milwaukee Milwaukee WI USA
                [ 6 ] Auckland University of Technology Auckland New Zealand
                [ 7 ] Caritas Institute of Higher Education Tseung Kwan O Hong Kong
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Debra Jackson, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

                Email: debra.jackson@ 123456uts.edu.au

                Article
                JOCN15257
                10.1111/jocn.15257
                7228254
                32281185
                df892210-7c1a-4839-a196-1b9b48775c13
                © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Pages: 3, Words: 3186
                Categories
                Editorial
                Editorials
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.0 mode:remove_FC converted:16.04.2020

                Nursing
                Nursing

                Comments

                Comment on this article