29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Enabling Factors for Sustaining Open Defecation-Free Communities in Rural Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Community Approaches to Total Sanitation (CATS) programmes, like the Sanitasi Total Berbasis Masyarakat (STBM) programme of the Government of Indonesia, have played a significant role in reducing open defecation though still little is known about the sustainability of the outcomes. We assessed the sustainability of verified Open Defecation Free (ODF) villages and explored the association between slippage occurrence and the strength of social norms through a government conducted cross-sectional data collection in rural Indonesia. The study surveyed 587 households and held focus group discussions (FGDs) in six ODF villages two years after the government’s ODF verification. Overall, the slippage rate (i.e., a combination of sub-optimal use of a latrine and open defecation at respondent level) was estimated to be 14.5% (95% CI 11.6–17.3). Results of multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that (1) weaker social norms, as measured by respondents’ perceptions around latrine ownership coverage in their community, (2) a lack of all-year round water access, and (3) wealth levels (i.e., not being in the richest quintile), were found to be significantly associated with slippage occurrence. These findings, together with qualitative analysis, concluded that CATS programmes, including a combination of demand creation, removal of perceived constraints through community support mechanisms, and continued encouragement to pursue higher levels of services with post-ODF follow-up, could stabilize social norms and help to sustain longer-term latrine usage in study communities. Further investigation and at a larger scale, would be important to strengthen these findings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Sanitation and Health

          As one article in a four-part PLoS Medicine series on water and sanitation, David Trouba and colleagues discuss the importance of improved sanitation to health and the role that the health sector can play in its advocacy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Do the right thing: but only if others do so

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Socio-cultural and behavioural factors constraining latrine adoption in rural coastal Odisha: an exploratory qualitative study

              Background Open defecation is widely practiced in India. To improve sanitation and promote better health, the Government of India (GOI) has instituted large scale sanitation programmes supporting construction of public and institutional toilets and extending financial subsidies for poor families in rural areas for building individual household latrines. Nevertheless, many household latrines in rural India, built with government subsidies and the facilitation and support of non-government organizations (NGO), remain unused. Literature on social, cultural and behavioural aspects that constrain latrine adoption and use in rural India is limited. This paper examines defecation patterns of different groups of people in rural areas of Odisha state in India to identify causes and determinants of latrine non-use, with a special focus on government-subsidized latrine owners, and shortcomings in household sanitation infrastructure built with government subsidies. Methods An exploratory study using qualitative methods was conducted in rural communities in Odisha state. Methods used were focus group discussions (FGDs), and observations of latrines and interviews with their owners. FGDs were held with frontline NGO sanitation program staff, and with community members, separately by caste, gender, latrine type, and age group. Data were analysed using a thematic framework and approach. Results Government subsidized latrines were mostly found unfinished. Many counted as complete per government standards for disbursement of financial subsidies to contracted NGOs were not accepted by their owners and termed as ‘incomplete’. These latrines lacked a roof, door, adequate walls and any provision for water supply in or near the cabin, whereas rural people had elaborate processes of cleansing with water post defecation, making presence of a nearby water source important. Habits, socialising, sanitation rituals and daily routines varying with caste, gender, marital status, age and lifestyle, also hindered the adoption of latrines. Interest in constructing latrines was observed among male heads for their female members especially a newlywed daughter-in-law, reflecting concerns for their privacy, security, and convenience. This paper elaborates on these different factors. Conclusions Findings show that providing infrastructure does not ensure use when there are significant and culturally engrained behavioural barriers to using latrines. Future sanitation programmes in rural India need to focus on understanding and addressing these behavioural barriers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                14 December 2017
                December 2017
                : 14
                : 12
                : 1572
                Affiliations
                [1 ]UNICEF Indonesia, World Trade Center 6 (10th Floor), Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Kav. 31, Jakarta 12920, Indonesia; acronin@ 123456unicef.org
                [2 ]UNICEF Indonesia, Kupang Field Office, Gedung NTT Satu Data, Jl. Polisi Militer No. 2, Kupang 85111, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia; mzainal@ 123456unicef.org
                [3 ]UNICEF, 3 UN Plaza, New York, NY 10017, USA; megnilo@ 123456unicef.org
                [4 ]National Development Planning Agency (Bappenas), Government of Indonesia, Jl. Taman Suropati No. 2, Menteng, Jakarta 10310, Indonesia; amardikanto@ 123456gmail.com
                [5 ]Planning, Research and Development Agency (Bapelitbang), Government of District of Alor, Jl. Bukit Doa Ayalon, Petleng, Alor Tengah Utara, Kabupaten Alor 85871, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia; umamkia3@ 123456gmail.com
                [6 ]Alor District Health Office, Government of District of Alor, Jl. Profesor W.Z. Yohannes, Subo, Alor Selatan, Kabupaten Alor 85871, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia; yamehatgc@ 123456gmail.com
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: modagiri@ 123456unicef.org ; Tel.: +62-21-2996-8017
                Article
                ijerph-14-01572
                10.3390/ijerph14121572
                5750990
                29240667
                4c2b3b53-0524-4c49-8113-73e2d6e05ab1
                © 2017 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 11 September 2017
                : 08 December 2017
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                open defecation free (odf) sustainability,latrine use,community approaches to total sanitation (cats),social norms,indonesia

                Comments

                Comment on this article